many years back in endless discussions on the forum at meetings of family or friendly on the relationship between natural resources inherent in our Land of the Silesian and Rewards of them flowing. One of the parties in the talks believe that the benefits of having a set of natural resources and their exploitation should be owned by the whole nation. How was it since the dawn of the benefits wieków.Otóż - call them profits - have been involving the property of the owner of the land under which they were lying. The rest of the nation had no part in it. The particular group of people working on their mining was at the same job, which was used in a way that almost slavishly. Is the reward their work was some form of participation in the benefits service?
had followed the years and centuries, changed ownership, the owners changed from kings, princes, by different companies until the form of nationalized by the state since the nineteenth century until the present day. Today we have a preference for privatization of all political options, which is a form of private property already practiced in past centuries. What has this nation who are not in any legal relation to the ownership of these goods? Acquiring such a modern mine owner will benefit from the exploitation of the deposit only for himself, paying only for the state taxes, license fees, and much more. Is it fair to measure public awareness of the XXI century?
you can not answer these questions. According to what the economy will be governed by the principle of dividing the benefit of natural resources inherent in the ground? And their treatment. Seemed a sensible idea to operation issues, processing and marketing deal with an economic solution, and that benefits the whole population was obdzielona nation. Already I fit it all started when I put in a homely ideologue, saying that the longer this before and it was called communism, in which force such a commandment
first The elimination of private monopoly of a key industry for the public;
second Reducing social inequality;
third Restriction of free competition and creating a state monopoly;
4th Changing accountability to the owners, the responsibility to "more equitable" state power;
5th Nationalization of profitable companies that their income supplied the state, not private shareholders;
6th Nationalisation of failing businesses, to protect them from the consequences of mismanagement so that managers are paying for the mistakes all citizens, not just the company.
We have witnessed the collapse of such a solution. This continues to this day. And what next? Similar concerns apply to other types of domestic industrial and agricultural activities. What model of obtaining the benefits of natural resources and their treatment would be perfectly fair? Can somebody give me probably the direction of thinking in this matter? Is this - allegedly - The best world is unthinkable perfect justice? If anyone is interested, then please participate in the discussion.
all justice for all optative
J urgis
0 comments:
Post a Comment